Comments from U.S. Delegation on ICEE-2000
Compiled by
Vittal S. Rao
Rutledge-Emerson Distinguished Professor of
Electrical and Computer Engineering
Director, Intelligent Systems Center
University of Missouri-Rolla
Rolla, MO 65409-0440
raov@umr.edu
January 19, 2001
The U.S. National Science Foundation provided a travel grant for a U.S. delegation to participate in the International Conference on Engineering Education (ICEE-2000) held in Taiwan and Taipei during August 14-18, 2000. The grant provided partial travel support to members of U.S. delegation. The U.S. delegation of 29 members, picked by a Selection Committee from among about 70 applicants, was requested to provide feedback on the following topics:
(i) General Impressions on ICEE-2000 and ICEE’s Concept of Progress Through Regional Alliances;
(ii) Suggestions for Future Conferences, including Areas of Improvements and Future Conference Venues;
(iii) Summary of Your Interactions with Delegates from Other Countries Throughout the Conference; and
(iv) Recommendation of Topics and Corresponding Methods/Mechanisms of International Cooperation in Engineering Education.
Members of US Delegation
Timothy Chang |
NJIT |
Barry Farbrother |
Ohio Northern University |
M. Jamshidi |
University of New Mexico |
C. Greg Jensen |
Brigham Young University |
Vern R. Johnson |
University of Arizona |
Ramiro Jordan |
University of New Mexico |
Ming C. Leu |
University of Missouri-Rolla |
Scott F. Midkiff |
Virginia Tech |
Kwabena A. Narh |
NJIT |
Steven P. Nichols |
University of Texas at Austin |
J.C. Olabe |
Christian Brothers University |
Barbara M. Olds |
Colorado School of Mines |
Marian Stachowicz |
University of Minnesota |
Joseph Tront |
Virginia Tech |
Deborah Walters |
SUNY Buffalo |
Jane P. Chang |
UCLA |
Dhinakar Kompala |
University of Colorado |
Juin J. Liou |
University of Central Florida |
Gunter Sharp |
Georgia Tech |
David T. Shaw |
SUNY Buffalo |
Shih-Liang Wang |
North Carolina A&T State University |
Sunil Sharma |
University of Idaho |
Rajesh Dave |
NJIT |
Stephen Raper |
University of Missouri-Rolla |
Sally Wood |
Santa Clara University |
Brandon Muramatsu |
UC Berkeley |
Timothy Philpot |
University of Missouri-Rolla |
Henry Liu |
University of Missouri-Columbia |
Vittal S. Rao |
University of Missouri-Rolla |
A summary of the comments received from the members of the delegation is compiled and given below:
- General Impressions on ICEE-2000 and ICEE’s Concept of Progress Through Regional Alliances
- ICEE-2000 was a very successful conference, which definitely furthered conference aim of Progress through Regional Alliances.
- The conference was extremely well organized and the hospitality was outstanding. The organizers are to be commended for the precision with arrangements.
- It was a very busy week and definitely worth the time invested in traveling to and from Taiwan.
- Cultural programs were very good.
- The keynote addresses were very good, especially the one by Dr. Chang Lin Tien, which set an excellent tone for the conference.
- Too many parallel sessions.
- Workshops were very valuable.
- The concept of iNEER is a particularly promising development and it should foster collaborations, which are initiated at the annual conferences.
- Suggestions for Future Conferences, including Areas of Improvements and Future Conference Venues
- It is desirable to have fewer paper sessions and more workshops.
- As the conference matures, it might be worth considering setting up a rotation of venues that would ensure that no one region dominates for long period.
- Consider organizing regional conferences.
- Invite the keynote speakers from different countries including the host country.
- One member felt that the split workshop and conference format is inefficient.
- Arrange mini workshops.
- Allow more time for discussions (Q&A) at the workshop
- Improve the participation from China, India, Russia, and Western Europe.
- Industry participation.
- Invite student participation.
- The session chairs should control the presentations precisely to the time limit to allow discussions at the end of each presentation.
- ICEE should become the forum where engineering education issues can be presented, discussed, analyzed, proposals presented, and creativity and innovation encouraged.
- A higher visibility of host country’s engineering schools.
- Summary of Your Interactions with Delegates from Other Countries Throughout the Conference
- Had ample opportunity to interact with people from other countries in the sessions, at meals, and on the bus.
- Learned about US-Brazil Higher Education Consortia Program.
- Personal contacts with a number of delegates
- Recommendation of Topics and Corresponding Methods/Mechanisms of International Cooperation in Engineering Education
- Increased coverage of information technology issues like meeting demand in fast-growing programs like computer engineering and science, integration of information technology in traditional engineering programs, and integration of business and engineering.
- Trends in higher education to day, which impact engineering education and global engineering practice.
- Issues related with non-high-tech related fields.
- International cooperation in engineering education
- Opportunities to share technology-based curriculum and courseware.
- Curriculum assessment.
- Global engineering practices.
- Interdisciplinary degree programs in engineering education.
- Interactive remote learning program.
- Best practices in engineering education.
- Provide success stories about the international collaborations.
- Pre-college engineering education.
- Curriculum transformations in emerging countries.
- Two-year degree programs.
- Engineering standards and practices.
Return to FEEDBACK ON ICEE-2000